viktor.vostrikov LinkedIn GitHub DE · EN
↤ HERO · 1100mm ↦
Senior technical partner / Solution architect who also builds

Turn a good idea into a first usable working version.

I help companies translate promising digital ideas, internal tools, and AI-supported workflows into usable first versions — through scope clarification, architecture, and hands-on implementation.

Request a Structured Review→ See how I work →

Send me 5–10 lines about the idea, the current situation, the constraints, and what a first version should prove.

X · 01 / AUDIENCE

When this work is useful

I am most useful when an idea is already valuable from a business perspective, but not yet technically well-shaped.

  • 01 You have a digital product idea, but not yet a clear technical scope.
  • 02 An internal process needs to become a usable tool or workflow.
  • 03 AI should become part of a real operating process, not remain a demo.
  • 04 The first stage does not need a large delivery setup, but an experienced technical partner.
  • 05 Architecture, integration, and implementation need to be considered together from the start.
X · 02 / VALUE

What companies gain

The value is not only the first version itself, but the technical clarity around it: what should be built, what should deliberately not be built, which risks exist, and how the work can become a handover-ready next step.

  • a clearer technical shape for an idea
  • fewer premature architecture decisions
  • a usable first version instead of slides or concepts only
  • a basis for internal alignment, budgeting, or next-stage delivery
  • an outcome that can be handed over instead of becoming consultant-dependent
X · 03 / FIRST STEP

First step: Structured Technical Review

A focused technical review of your idea, internal tool, or planned workflow. The goal is not a long consulting report, but a reliable first technical orientation.

Typical output:
  • clarified scope
  • first architecture outline
  • key risks and dependencies
  • sensible technical options
  • recommendation for the first working version
  • rough implementation path

Useful before an idea becomes a prototype, MVP, or larger delivery initiative.

Request a Structured Review→
X · 04 / METHOD

How I work

01

Structured Technical Review

I clarify the goal, scope, users, system context, risks, and sensible technical options.

Output:
  • technical direction
  • scope boundaries
  • architecture outline
  • implementation plan for the first version
02

First working version

I build a usable first version: small enough to remain realistic, but concrete enough to enable real decisions.

Output:
  • working core workflow
  • pragmatic architecture
  • traceable technical decisions
  • first integrations or automations
03

Handover

The solution should not depend on me permanently. Structure, documentation, and handover-readiness are therefore part of the work.

Output:
  • understandable technical structure
  • documentation of key decisions
  • clear next steps
  • handover to an internal team or next delivery partner
X · 05 / SELECTED WORK

Selected work

01 Enterprise

Quality Data Capture & Process Control

Context:
Production environment with device-based measurement data and operational user groups.
Task:
Measurement capture, business validation, diagnostics, and UI interaction needed to work as one reliable process.
My contribution:
Solution architecture, UI concept, integration logic, diagnostics, and reusable technical components.
Result:
A production-facing workflow that integrates measurement data into daily operations in a usable, traceable, and maintainable way.
domain Manufacturing role Solution architect stack UI · integration · diagnostics
02 Independent

VTS — Video Transcription & Summarization Workflow

Context:
Long videos should not have to be reviewed, transcribed, and summarized manually.
Task:
Build a repeatable workflow from video URL to segmented transcription, structured summary, logs, and operational control.
My contribution:
Architecture and implementation of a self-hosted workflow with download pipeline, audio segmentation, Whisper-based transcription, local LLM summarization, and task-oriented processing.
Result:
A first usable working version of an AI-supported workflow — not as an isolated demo, but as a repeatable technical process.
View on GitHub
domain Media · AI role Architect & builder stack self-hosted · pipelines · AI
03 Independent

Personal Doctor — Medical Document Workflow MVP

Context:
Medical documents contain relevant values, but are often difficult to process in a structured way.
Task:
A narrowly scoped MVP concept for upload, OCR/text extraction, human review, normalized measurements, rule-based evaluation, recommendations, and a timeline model.
My contribution:
Technical product structure, backend architecture, data model, review workflow, rule engine concept, and step-by-step implementation planning.
Result:
A clearly bounded and traceable MVP concept that breaks a complex health-tech idea into verifiable technical steps.
domain Health-tech role Architect & builder stack OCR · rules · MVP
X · 06 / ABOUT

About

I am a senior software engineer and solution architect with over 20 years of professional experience in enterprise delivery, SAP integration, and integration-heavy system landscapes.

My work combines architecture, backend and integration development, operational thinking, and practical AI-supported product development.

The independent workstream on this website is not a departure from my enterprise background, but an extension of it: the same abilities — clarifying scope, designing architecture, understanding interfaces, implementing pragmatically, and building for handover — apply very well to early digital product ideas, internal tools, and AI-supported workflows.

Based in Germany. Focused on selected, clearly scoped technical initiatives.

X · 07 / FIT

[ Less suitable ]

Less suitable are classic body-leasing setups, purely ticket-based execution, permanent support operations, or initiatives without clear responsibility and decision-making ability on the client side.

The collaboration is most useful where an idea, process, or workflow needs to be technically sharpened and translated into a first usable solution.

Sharpen an idea technically?

Send me a short description of your idea, the current context, and what a first working version should prove.

Useful are 5–10 lines about:

  • idea or problem
  • target users
  • current process
  • technical environment
  • constraints
  • desired outcome of the first version
Write an email→